Arboretum Park receives top award for safety
THE congratulations heaped on Arboretum Park for winning an
award acknowledging its safety is an irony not lost on the
victims of crime who have walked through the green space.
Arboretum was England's first public park and was given to
Derby by Joseph Strutt in 1840 to provide a public space for
exercise and relaxation.
But its press has been less than positive of late.
The Evening Telegraph reported last month that police were
having to step up patrols in the park after six attacks.
Parks with a Green Flag Award should we welcoming, safe,
secure, clean, sustainable, well marketed and involve the
community.
So says the judging criteria, which also stipulates that the
park or green space must be a "secure place for all members of
the community to use or traverse" and that it must have "good
and safe access".
The Ford family of Normanton is of the opinion that
Arboretum Park falls short of that.
Joe Ford, 16, sustained a broken leg and facial injuries
after being attacked by a gang of youths in the park.
His father, Alan, 55, said he was disgusted and bewildered
at how the park could scoop the award.
"When I first heard about the award I thought it was someone
having a sick joke," said Mr Ford.
"The people living around the park are concerned that it's
becoming a no-go zone and, in my opinion, until the council is
capable of controlling that park it should be shut up."
But the Civic Trust, which organises the Green Flag Award,
said that while it could not guarantee award-winning parks
would not suffer crime, it said it judged the spaces on what
they did to try to make them safe.
There have been many improvements since a major revamp was
given the go-ahead in 2003 after Derby City Council won a £5.6m
National Lottery grant.
The funding included £4.2m for entrances, a community
building with a cafe, CCTV cameras, sports changing rooms and
the refurbishment of listed buildings.
A further £1.4m went towards employing rangers to look after
the grounds and other maintenance costs.
The revamp was aimed at enticing more visitors to the
park.
A spokeswoman for the trust said: "The judges commended the
use of CCTV and good lighting. They commented that the clear
sight lines and vistas give a sense of safety to the site, and
are inviting."
And in the report, the judges concluded: "It is a great site
and the investment will prove worthwhile as it has such a
strong community input.
"All credit to the manager and staff and partners for their
present and future efforts to come."
Mr Ford said he took issue with that. He said: "The CCTV
coverage of people going in and out of the park is not good
enough quality to get any proper information from.
"The camera in the area where my son was attacked was broken
for three months."
Steve Medlock, head of parks at Derby City Council, said the
attacks were not necessarily a park issue.
"When the judging took place in May was before the current
spate of unrest.
"It is a problem which has surfaced in the park but not only
in the park, it is going on in the area as a whole so from that
point of view it is not particularly a park issue."
He said efforts had been made to make the park safe.
"There are very few places in the park where people can hide
but if a gang of lads comes on to the park they are not
bothered about hiding."
Click on the button to share this story with a
friend
var addthis_pub = 'janeyg1976';









5 Comments
by Shakeel, Derby
Tuesday, August 19 2008, 9:20AM
“By the way Mr Singh, in case you wondering, the technical term is "You just got served".”
by Shakeel, Derby
Tuesday, August 19 2008, 9:19AM
“Mr Singh should be aware that we are not in 1946, we are not at the partition in India/Pakistan, this is 2008 and we are in Britain and his mentality should reflect that.
His comments have an overtly racist nature. The vast majority of the people living around that park are British.
Also he chooses to discriminate against those of Pakistani origin. Well Mr Singh should be aware (and would be if he visited the park) that it is built next to a council estate on one side which is predominantly white and the Normanton Rd side of the park is near rented properties which are occupied predominantly be Eastern Europeans. There is also a great deal of Kurdish people in the area.
If he had a clue about the park he would be aware that some of the problems in the park were caused by groups of young men from different ethnic groups hanging around feeling intimidated by each other, and that the council has been doing work to fix that. He would also be aware that the park has actually got rangers as well as CCTV.
As for local councils offering bribes to organisations, the accusation is slanderous and ludicrous. anyone would think the councilors owned the park and hence it would benefit them... LOL What reward do local councilors get from the park being with or without an award?I suggest if you have any EVIDENCE you walk the walk, or are you just another one of those who can only talk the talk, or try to anyway.”
by BV Singh, Derby
Monday, August 18 2008, 2:37PM
“It is natural for Shakeel to defend the crime in the park because after all it is only his fellow Pakistani yobs that run amock in there causing trouble.It is definitely a no-go area for decent folk,and needs strict policing by constables or rangers,without which it is a travesty of justice to give it the award.More likely it needs a kick up its backside.Councillors of the ward who incidentally are all Pakistani,must have bribed the council and/or the Green Flag people to get the award.No other way would it have got it.”
by Shakeel, Derby
Monday, August 18 2008, 10:51AM
“It's not as bad as people like to make out. More people get hurt in the town centre on the the weekends yet I don't see anyone running away declaring that a No-Go zone.”
by andy, derby
Monday, August 18 2008, 9:31AM
“i didnt realise it was April Fools day.”