Belper residents have their say about possible Tesco site

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, September 02, 2008
Profile image for This is Derbyshire

This is Derbyshire

CAMPAIGNERS fighting plans for a new Tesco in Belper have

drawn up a list of developments local people would rather see

on the proposed site.

BATS (Belper Against Tesco Superstore) was formed in May

last year after the retail giant spoke with Amber Valley

Borough Council about building a store in Derwent Street.

Now, the group has surveyed people about what they want the

site used for.

A report was sent to the council to help write a brief for

any company wanting to develop on the site.

Most of the 70 residents who took part wanted the 80,000sq

ft area used for better leisure facilities.

Suggestions included a bowling alley, children's play area,

cinema, outdoor swimming facilities and a riverside

promenade.

BATS spokesman Andy Minion said: "The main thing the report

showed is people want anything other than Tesco on that

site.

"About 60% of people wanted leisure developments of some

kind.

"I can't speak for the residents who completed our survey,

but I think there may be a perception, whether right or wrong,

that the current leisure centre in Belper is a bit tired."

The BATS report also gave reasons why those surveyed did not

want the new supermarket.

One reason was they were worried the store could mean the

destruction of fields and trees, cause flooding, light

pollution and take local shops' business away.

People also feared the development would not fit in with the

Derwent Valley Mills World Heritage Site.

The report was sent to the council so it could use the

information in preparing a development brief for the land

between the A6 and the River Derwent, which includes Derwent

Street.

BATS was angry the brief was being prepared with the help of

consultants acting on behalf of Tesco, but the authority said

this was usual.

A spokeswoman said: "The purpose of this brief is to expand

on the policies in the adopted local plan and provide further

detail as to what forms of development will be acceptable.

"It will not contain any specific proposals but is intended

to guide prospective developers in putting together any

planning proposals.

"It is common practice for local planning authorities, given

limited resources, to work in partnership with the private

sector to prepare development briefs."

The completed brief will be passed to the council's planning

board for consideration and, if approved, will then be the

subject of a six-week public consultation.

No definite completion date has been set.

A Tesco spokesperson said no decision would be taken until

the views of "local residents and other interested parties"

were taken into account.

Click on the button to share this story with a

friend

"addthis_url = location.href; addthis_title = document.title; return addthis_click(this);"

target="_blank">

"http://s9.addthis.com/button1-addthis.gif" width="125" height=

"16" border="0" alt="Bookmark and Share">

2
Tweet this article
Report

2 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Sandra, ilkeston

    Tuesday, September 02 2008, 11:54AM

    “The main problem is that Belper does not need another supermarket and the independent shops would suffer. Look what Sainsbury's has done to Matlock already. I am shortly to move to Belper and no way do I want to live in another Tesco Town like Ilkeston”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Paul, Derby

    Tuesday, September 02 2008, 9:51AM

    “"About 60% of people wanted leisure developments of some kind" Only 70 people were bothered enough to take part in thr first place, so being generous that's 40 people out of a belper population of around 21,000 want more leisure facilities on the site.... Hmmm maybe BATS should wind their necks in. Incidentally I work in Belper and use the gym at the leisure centre. It's cramped, usually too hot and generally tired.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters