Council staff back action in row over allowances

Trusted article source icon
Friday, May 21, 2010
Profile image for This is Derbyshire

This is Derbyshire

STAFF at Derby City Council have voted in favour of industrial action over the decision to take away their car allowances.

Public sector union Unison has balloted its members to see who would be in favour of industrial action – such as leaving their cars at home to show the impact on their work.

And it also sought to see if members would be in favour of all-out strike action.

The results showed that 62% would be in favour of industrial action and nearly 49% were in favour of a full strike.

The results have to be referred to a committee of the union to be approved and industrial action could then start within a week of the council being notified.

Charlie Carruth, regional organiser for Unison, said that was likely to be in the form of staff leaving their own cars at home.

He said: "Our members are rightly angered by yet another hit to their pay packets. They are getting no pay rise this year and now this council wants to axe car allowances as well."

The council is axing a £98.25 monthly travel allowance paid to 889 people who need cars for work and reducing the mileage rate of a further 1,000 "casual car users" to save £807,000 a year, and make the authority more environmentally-friendly.

Some employees have been offered one-off payments of £1,200 and are being urged to use public transport or pool cars instead of their own. People still using their own cars will get 40p a mile for fuel. But staff and unions have maintained their concerns it could have an impact on the ability to do their jobs efficiently.

Mr Carruth said: "Derby City Council must intervene to resolve this dispute, using independent arbitrators if need be, so our members can get on with delivering high-quality and vital public services."

Last year, the council's own internal disputes panel had ordered the changes to the allowance should be stopped but that decision was overruled by the full council, leading Unison to issue the ballot for action.

Mr Carruth said: "Given the council's own disputes committee found in favour of the union's case, one would questions why the council would want to see industrial action take place. We're available to resolve this dispute if the plans are put on hold. The ball is firmly in the council's court now."

The city council last night said it did not want to comment on the strike threat.

21
Tweet this article
Report

21 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by David Gale, Derby

    Saturday, May 22 2010, 2:10PM

    “I can't see any justification for expecting the long-term, cut-price use an employee's personal vehicle for business travel.

    Call their bluff and go with the car pool and then demonstrate how much more it costs the tax-payer.

    Alternatively, do what I used to do for long journeys where the train wasn't an option: refuse to use your own car and force the council to hire one. Their hire rates are very reasonable!”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by John English, Derby

    Saturday, May 22 2010, 9:13AM

    “Don't hold your breath waiting.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by mark, derby

    Saturday, May 22 2010, 7:25AM

    “Would any of you narrow minded idiots do part of your job and not get paid for it, NO I assume. The council are not expecting workers to use public transport etc but they are expecting staff providing vital care services, often long distances away to still use their own vehicles without appropriate payment. I wish the idiots of Derby would get their facts right before knocking hard working stressed staff.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Disappointed, Derby

    Saturday, May 22 2010, 12:01AM

    “It is nice to see how valued the council workers are!!! These are people who work very hard for not a lot of money, to keep this city running. These are the social workers who look after our elderly and disabled, our children in need. These are the people who keep the streets clean, who sort out environmental health issues. The people who empty our bins, who ensure the street lights work, monitor CCTV, run the community safety initiatives, the housing visitors, the wardens. The list is endless. Without them our City would simply not be.
    While I appreciate we are in a time of economic decline, and job losses, I can also see the good that so many people who work for the council do. There seems to be a lot of comparison between the council and the private sector. As someone who has worked in both, I can assure you that life in the private sector is a lot nicer than the public sector. In the private sector I had new equipment, a decent clean air conditioned office, a works mobile phone, a salary that reflected the hours and job that I did, and numerous other comforts that I didn¿t get working for the council. I didn't work for the council for perks. I worked more hours than I was paid for, and drove more miles than I was remunerated for, and sat at an old desk in a building that was not fit for purpose, I used my own mobile phone and didn¿t claim back for the calls because I cared about the job I did. I cared about the people of Derby and I cared about doing the best I could for them.
    I agree that the car user allowance needs to be reviewed. I agree there are people getting it who don't do the mileage to warrant it. I agree that savings can be made. This does not have to mean a blanket removal of terms and conditions. A review would have been a good starting point. How about providing pool cars or council vehicles for home care aids to go from house to house and complete personal care tasks, or for social workers to go and do their assessments and visits, or for mobile wardens to do their rounds? Because it is not cost effective or practical! Instead the council expect people to use their own vehicles to carry out journeys which are council business. The HMRC rate of 40p a mile has not been reviewed since 2002, and as such does not reflect the current price of petrol. The cheapest locally being 118p per litre for unleaded. So that 40p a mile is expected to cover the petrol bill, and wear and tear and maintenance and car tax and MOT and insurance, which incidentally has to be business use. But it is okay, because council workers are greedy and should be grateful for their jobs.

    Well I say, thank you council staff! You are the back bone of the city and do an amazing job.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by louise, belper

    Friday, May 21 2010, 11:25PM

    “y so many haters of council staff, they work to help the vulnerable and provide much needed services, often paid less than those in private industry. we all face cutbacks its not easy 4 any1”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Carole, Mickleover

    Friday, May 21 2010, 6:26PM

    “Get on with your jobs - while you have them. Better to lose a little from your expenses than have to cut your hours.

    Like the previous contributors I have no sympathy whatsoever - if you want any try the dictionary, you might find it in there.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Mike, DERBY

    Friday, May 21 2010, 5:01PM

    “Be satisfied with the 40p a mile.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by JF, Derby

    Friday, May 21 2010, 4:24PM

    “I worked for a different Council and looked into car allowances whilst I was there. At that Council, many of the people who get this allowance don't do the mileage to justify essential user rather than casual user status. Some never even left the building during the course of a working day.
    Essential user status was abused as it was a hangover from previous roles or a manager was using it as a pay increase to keep someone sweet. Many of those not entitled were the senior managers and directors so I was told it couldn't be touched. Would have saved a fortune to change it.
    Was the same for telephone allowances - they got hand helds and mobiles but were paid an allowance for having a land line.
    Go for it Derby City - you are absolutely right to do this.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Vivian, Mackworth

    Friday, May 21 2010, 2:40PM

    “I am a carer for a disabled relative at the princely sum of £1.57 per hour. I'm allowed a part time job which pays £65 before tax per week. The bus fare per week is £14. More than 20 per cent. If the council staff were paid,for example, £20,000 per annum and had to pay out £1000 per annum from their own pay, I'd be sympathetic. However,since it is an allowance on top of their salary, I do not. We all have to travel.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by ian, derby

    Friday, May 21 2010, 2:35PM

    “RM Spondon
    Alot of private companies, my employer included refuse to acknowledge Unions, therefore being a paid up member is irrelivent and not an option as they have no power to influence anything”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters