BREAKING NEWS
 

Cuts likely to get deeper as Derby City Council has to save another £2.5m

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
Profile image for Derby Telegraph

Derby Telegraph

A FURTHER £2.5 million may have to be sliced from Derby City Council's future budget as a result of the Government's Autumn Statement.

Made last week, the statement by Chancellor George Osborne sets out the Government's spending for the coming years.

  1. XXXCaption in here

  2. Paul Bayliss is having to face some tough choices as city leader.

    Paul Bayliss is having to face some tough choices as city leader.

And while some of the headlines – such as money towards super-fast broadband – made good reading for the city, officers warn the overall calculation could still leave Derby losing out.

Council leader Councillor Paul Bayliss said officers have spent days poring over the details of the statement after it was published on Wednesday.

£10 OFF OUR SPRINT 20 RACE*

The Kurburgring

View details

Print voucher

start with 10 qualifying laps and then line up for 2 x 20 lap races ALL FOR £40 ( normally £50)

Terms: *terms and conditions apply
Age and height restrictions apply
Minimum of 4 people per race

Contact: 01623 702148

Valid until: Saturday, June 15 2013

"After un-picking what's been said, we think it will mean an additional £2.5 million cut from the council's budget in 2014-15," said Mr Bayliss.

The council is currently consulting on its draft budget which sets out £20 million of cuts to come in 2013-14.

A further £42 million will have to be made in the following two years.

The Autumn Statement means, during 2014-15, an additional £2.5 million will have to be saved.

Mr Bayliss said: "It's not good news for Derby I'm afraid. That £2.5million will mean things we have kept in this year's budget will have to be looked at again. That's things like Derby Live funding."

The council is having to consult on 350 voluntary redundancies as part of planning the budget. It is not clear if the additional £2.5 million would have any impact on those figures.

And Mr Bayliss said even where there were positive announcements for Derby in the Autumn Statement, detail was thin and often raised more questions than answers.

"The Government did announce that we'd been successful in our bid to its fund for super-fast broadband but as yet we don't know how much we will get," he said. "It is a £50 million fund and 12 authorities were successful so if it is shared equally we will get £3-£4 million but we don't know anything yet."

And whatever the Government does invest, the council will be obliged to match the funding.

It is also in a similar position with flood defence spending. Ministers announced Derby had been shortlisted for money to implement its master plan for flood defence work.

The council wants to encourage developers to build along the river front, incorporating flood defences into underground car parks.

While Government has shortlisted Derby for a slice of £120 million for additional flood defences, the bidding criteria have not been released and match funding would be required. Derby City Council has not built such funding into its capital programme yet.

Mr Bayliss said other uncertainties surround changes to small business rate relief. This is being extended to April 2014.

However, it is not yet clear if this cost will be absorbed by the council or the Treasury.

If it is not shared or absorbed by Government it will mean an additional £238 million cut to local government – Derby's share is not yet known.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for Derby400

    by Derby400

    Tuesday, December 11 2012, 9:48PM

    “Things can't be that tight - my line manager has a morning off every week to play sport and more holidays than your average MP. The head of the department is away on jollies all the time. In fact they could probably run it better with half the staff.”

  • Profile image for leolady

    by leolady

    Tuesday, December 11 2012, 7:36PM

    “Our esteemed council has made much of how they have asked staff to take Voluntary Redundancy to help with the savings they have to make.What a farce, the vast majority of people who applied have been turned down, in my case 'due to demands on the service', this same council is more than happy to let countles staff spend their days staring into space or fiddling with their mobiles, I am talking about the quite newly formed 'business support hub' in particular.”

  • Profile image for sniffer

    by sniffer

    Tuesday, December 11 2012, 2:58PM

    “@davsl totally agree with your comments,however most posters on here hate the council”

  • Profile image for davsl

    by davsl

    Tuesday, December 11 2012, 2:40PM

    “Are you saying council staff or any staff should not get a living wage?
    I will ask whats the point of working if you cannot live on the wage they pay.”

  • Profile image for Marcus_oNE

    by Marcus_oNE

    Tuesday, December 11 2012, 12:07PM

    “Agree with Janine..why pursue the living wage knowing full well we cannot afford it. make sensible decisions based on the needs of the city rather than scoring political brownie points; the council is not some kind of 'job club' where it is about giving employees more and more.. the first priority is to its citizens so focus on them instead of employees!”

  • Profile image for janine2011

    by janine2011

    Tuesday, December 11 2012, 10:42AM

    “Perhaps the living wage they intend to pay council staff should be forgotten, along with the assistants for councillors. Tell the new crime chap he can't have a deputy, that will save even more, especially if said chap takes a pay cut.
    Priorities, none of these are priorities so can be put on the back burner.”

  • Profile image for BusinessOwner

    by BusinessOwner

    Tuesday, December 11 2012, 10:12AM

    “Typical Labour, they will cut services due to their own incompetence, then try to blame the government.
    This rotten council is playing party politics with OUR city.”

  • Profile image for Derby_Stu

    by Derby_Stu

    Tuesday, December 11 2012, 9:56AM

    “Does this mean the council will now up the proposed £40 brown bin tax to cover its losses?”

  • Profile image for Tamas

    by Tamas

    Tuesday, December 11 2012, 8:22AM

    “So, the council blow 30 million on refurbishing their palace, which in effect is going to cost three times that much, but everyone else has to suffer cuts from care to bin collections. Yes, I do realise the money was ring-fenced, but come on, should money for projects like this not be redirected to more important things, at least until we're in the black again.

    One word - PRIORITIES!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article