BREAKING NEWS
 

Derby City Council to axe another 350 jobs

Trusted article source icon
Monday, November 26, 2012
Profile image for pwhyattt_dt

pwhyattt_dt

A FURTHER 350 jobs are to be axed at Derby City Council – taking the total number of redundancies over a three-year period to more than 1,000.

The latest staff exodus will be completed by April 2014, the Labour-run authority has confirmed.

Bosses blame "unfair" Government cuts for the continuing mass exodus of employees.

Staff whose roles are at risk have be warned they may have to reapply for their jobs. 

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

The announcement comes as the authority released details of its draft budget for the next three years.

Roger Kershaw, strategic director of resources, said the losses were because the council was being forced to save £63 million over the next three years – an amount he described as "phenomenal".

Leader Paul Bayliss said he deeply regretted every job loss and that compulsory redundancies will be kept to an "absolute minimum".

He said: "This isn't a budget we would set naturally ourselves. It is a budget that has been shaped by Government cuts being too deep and too fast.

"It isn't a budget I would commend to anyone."

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for asctty

    by asctty

    Tuesday, November 27 2012, 7:37PM

    “DCC have been cutting back on education support for the last year or so. I hope that these latest proposed cutbacks are not going to affect getting education provision in Derby out of this lamentable mire:

    http://tinyurl.com/cxvbkd6

  • Profile image for Neo_MadBadger

    by Neo_MadBadger

    Tuesday, November 27 2012, 7:26PM

    “sm, I see you are up to your usual. Just google "highly salaried" and see if it is a commonly-used phrase. I'll give you a clue: it isn't. High salaried on the other hand is. Only in your world, eh sm.

    Anyway, have you submitted that FOI request yet, in order to answer your loaded question?”

  • Profile image for smshogun

    by smshogun

    Tuesday, November 27 2012, 7:01PM

    “No Neo, you don't know what I mean; high salaried positions suggests those at the very upper end of the salaried posts, highly salaried applies to many more who are on salaries but not at the upper end of the wage spectrum. If in doubt then don't assume, just ask.”

  • Profile image for kessie2012

    by kessie2012

    Tuesday, November 27 2012, 1:03PM

    “MORE ON THE DOLE then weeks later they get offered jobs working for free just the dole money slave labour back to the dark ages .all these cuts cost more money as they have to be kept by the taxpayers unemployment benifits ,so daft really cut councillors expenses first ,we dont need a veladrome we have cycle tracks along the river and other places .who will use it /they wont be able to aford bikes most of derby will be unemployed at this rate .money wasted on the council house totaly unecasery . then theres an incinerator we dont want that will put rates up high the cost of building it /only to be used for 25 years plus the running costs once burn its a differnt thing its highly contaminated waste .in its original form it can be recycled and money earnt from it all . bayliss is so thick cant see through his glasses .he should go to specsavers then se a nut specailist .if he put dynamite where his brain is he d not blow his ears apart . whimp . only wants what he likes .elections due soon get him out .”

  • Profile image for DCFCOAP

    by DCFCOAP

    Tuesday, November 27 2012, 8:12AM

    “Basically it's down to this: Keep the pound in your pocket or give it so someone can have a job and do the jobs you don't want to.
    Also, I'd like to add that if those at the top at the Council earning a high wage were to take a wage cut, because you are Public Servants that WE pay for, then many of these people could be kept in jobs.
    Front line, back room, they are jobs that have to be done.
    How can Councillors and Management justify thier massive salaries when others have to go to subsidise them?”

  • Profile image for Filnzero

    by Filnzero

    Tuesday, November 27 2012, 7:29AM

    “Why do not people understand the difference between capital cost and running cost!!! The capital cost will be paid back through revenue and provide jobs at the Veladrome and the new Swimming pool.This will be borrowed money leant to the City council under strict criteria, pretty much like a mortgage. Wages are overheads. This can not be funded with borrowed money. Simple. The spiral to disaster and the REASON WHY we are in the mess we are in. The living wage is great for those who receive it. Perhaps far better to stick to a minimum wage and reduce the redundancy toll. Living wage - All the pats on the back from Williamson et al. Now the ideology turns to reality.............”

  • Profile image for H1234

    by H1234

    Monday, November 26 2012, 9:31PM

    “and yet they are intending pay to the living wage and can build a velodrome...oh and have built a new council house...”

  • Profile image for dave12548

    by dave12548

    Monday, November 26 2012, 8:59PM

    “And yet they intend to pay the 'living' wage !”

  • Profile image for TommyToms

    by TommyToms

    Monday, November 26 2012, 8:57PM

    “The problem will also be that the 'redundancies' will be done on a politically correct role-by-role basis, rather than actually looking at people's abilities. So someone who has 3 weeks a year off sick and is incompetent but who works in a more 'essential' role may keep their job, whereas an incredibly hard working and intelligent person may lose theirs if their job is deemed non-essential.

    Plus a lot of the most experienced staff will have already taken voluntary redundancy given that they are the only ones for whom its financially viable with so many years service (bigger pay off).

    Some common sense and business mindedness needs to be applied when making cuts of this size and you can more or less guarantee this wont be the case.”

  • Profile image for chaddesden

    by chaddesden

    Monday, November 26 2012, 7:39PM

    “It's dreadful that so many public sector staff are losing their jobs all over the country. I know what is happening, it happened to me in March 2011 with no choice but to leave. So many jobs going everywhere in the private and public sector, the NHS too. I fear for the younger generations.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article