Derby gang of four jailed over massive TV box swindle

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, February 23, 2012
Profile image for Derby Telegraph

Derby Telegraph

FOUR men have been jailed for their parts in a sophisticated international scam to defraud TV giant Virgin Media of up to £32 million.

The fraud involved distributing set-top boxes which allowed customers to pick up Virgin Media television channels without paying a subscription.

The Derby gang operated from a house in Littleover, where they received programmes through a legitimate subscription.

Derby Crown Court was told that Paul Hartrick, 51, was the head of the city branch of the conspiracy.

He imported a type of set-top box from Korea that could be modified to receive the Virgin Media channels without a subscription.

He sold these boxes to customers for a one-off payment of up to £120, the court was told.

He and his accomplices – Melvin Howard, Anthony Ginnivan and Amber Ahmed – all pleaded guilty to conspiring to defraud the company.

Ginnivan, 48, owned the house in Fernwood Crescent, Littleover, and rented a room, which was used for the scam, to Howard, 62.

Prosecutor Martin Hurst told the court that this bedroom was the "nerve centre" of the operation.

Inside the room, Ginnivan and Howard, under the instruction of Hartrick, had set up 44 set-top boxes, connected to the Virgin Media network through 13 legitimate subscriptions, for which they paid.

The fourth fraudster, Ahmed, was responsible for ordering the legitimate subscriptions, called Smartcards, from Virgin Media.

Police estimated that ringleader Hartrick would have made more than £100,000 from selling the set-top boxes.

And Virgin Media said the scam could have cost the company up to £32 million in lost revenue from subscription charges – both from the activities of the Derby gang and the operation in Hong Kong.

Hartrick, of Sharpe Street, Tamworth, was jailed for five years yesterday.

Howard, of Stoney Lane, Spondon, was jailed for two years and ten months, Ginnivan received two years and one month and Ahmed, of Dover Street, Derby, was sent to prison for a year.

Ahmed was also given an extra six months for a separate fraud offence.

Detective Constable Adam Govan, investigating officer in the case, said: "This was a sophisticated fraud, taking place on an international scale.

"The jailing of these four men sends out a message that people who involve themselves in this kind of crime can be tracked down and will be brought to justice.

"This may be seen as a faceless crime but in the end it is Virgin Media customers who lose out because the company has to raise prices to make up for its losses."

The men were caught after Virgin Media became aware that there was a large-scale fraud happening in the UK.

The company said it came to light through "intelligence" and it became apparent that some people were viewing the channels without having paid a subscription.

The firm set up its own Starview set-top boxes in homes across the UK to try to pick up the illegal signals.

Then it switched off sections of its Virgin Media output in sequence to find out the source of the illegal operation. Eventually, experts pinpointed where the signals were being decoded to be the house in Littleover and contacted the police. The men were arrested and the full scale of the fraud came to light.

A fifth man, Korean national Jeong Woo You, was also arrested and charged with the fraud. He was released on bail and then absconded.

Sentencing the four, Judge Michael Fowler said: "Hartrick, you are the senior of the defendants in front of me. You are clearly, in commercial terms, management.

"You had direct benefit through your business from the sale of the boxes. You were directly involved in setting up the operation.

"The benefit you received is in dispute but there is no dispute that it is in excess of £100,000. The benefit you expected to be achieved by fraud was far more, no doubt.

"In addition, you recruited others to become involved with this fraud."

He said the loss to Virgin Media was "extremely difficult" to estimate but that he was satisfied it ran into millions of pounds.

Speaking for Hartrick, Dean Kershaw said his client had always maintained he had sold the boxes for £65 each and had not sold more than 1,500.

Hartrick said he was not the person who had physically set up the operation in Littleover but accepted he had recruited Howard, who then recruited others, said Mr Kershaw.

Dean Bower, for Howard, accepted he had brought Ginnivan and Howard into the scam but did not oversee them. "He received very little reward for his role," said Mr Bower.

The court heard that Ginnivan was the caretaker for the premises and Ahmed was at the bottom level of the small gang.

How the scam works

VIRGIN Media supplies a digital cable TV service to subscribers in the UK.

In order to receive the service, customers are given a set-top box and a smartcard, which determines the channels that can be watched – depending on what has been paid for.

The TV signal sent to the boxes is scrambled but the card, together with the box, decodes these signals and gives a clear picture and sound.

The Littleover set-up broadcasted signals to users who had special set-top boxes that they had bought with one-off payments. The users had no smart cards and had not paid for the service.

These boxes were manufactured in Korea by company Irumtek, which is suspected to be the main beneficiary of the fraud.

Virgin Media estimated that up to 22,000 people were receiving free channels through this operation but defendant Jeong Woo You told police he believed there were up to 12,000 customers.

Ringleader Paul Hartrick, who imported the Starview set-top boxes, maintained in his plea that he had sold no more than 1,500 of them.

Irumtek also sent a software engineer over to the Littleover property to spend weeks working on the set-top boxes and improving the system.

The fraudulent operation ran between February 2010 and February last year.

12
Tweet this article
Report

12 Comments

  • Profile image for eric9629

    by eric9629

    Thursday, February 23 2012, 5:28PM

    “So the Korean absconded,did they really think he would hang around waiting to recieve a prison term. Still its saved us the expense of keeping him in one of H.M.P hotels !”

  • Profile image for Nicky_Gregory

    by Nicky_Gregory

    Thursday, February 23 2012, 4:16PM

    “I must say that the figure Virgin Media have come up with is a bit too far fetched to say the least. What's with that then? As said by a few others, I'm not condoning this crime at all, it's just that the sentences are out of order. I hope they appeal the decision and are successful.

    Good luck, Mel. You're a good man!”

  • Profile image for senort

    by senort

    Thursday, February 23 2012, 3:48PM

    “Unlucky lads, never mess with big business, you would have been better robbing the general public the government couldn't care less what happens to us.”

  • Profile image for itsmemarko

    by itsmemarko

    Thursday, February 23 2012, 2:08PM

    “drop the prices and everyone would be happy to pay and they wouldnt get ripped off...still wrong to do it ....but we are all fed up of being charged to much.”

  • Profile image for bazarr

    by bazarr

    Thursday, February 23 2012, 1:18PM

    “this is quite big.....wish i got my hands on one of them boxes..
    they charge a ton to have rip off ..”

  • Profile image for Rob_Brello

    by Rob_Brello

    Thursday, February 23 2012, 1:17PM

    “The amount of money virgin quoted is probably highly exaggerated, perhaps in its small 1,000's maybe but not millions.. the sentences are pathetic, rioters, muggers, joy riders who kill and burglars get far less sentences for more serious crime.. i dont believe for a second mr branson upped his price due to these people.. he promised he was doubling everyone's internet speed at no extra cost then sent out letters stating he had to increase his prices from anything between £1.25 up to as far as im aware £4:75. i think judges need to put things into perspective & dish out fitting sentences to all, the kwik fit guy who stole a car then killed a little boy.. how long in respect to these sentences does he deserve, what will he get? i doubt anything near as harsh. The Justice system needs a massive revamp and the "old skool" people presiding over people needs new influx to mete out some correct punishment & not send people home with slapped wrists or to so called prison holiday camps where criminals have a cushier life than most hard up hard working families who dont break the law. The beds and cells these men have taken deserve to be given to far more worrying criminals.. Yes i agree they need to be punished but in this way?? so harshly?? sorry but no.. like janine has said.. money talks .. its unfair and archaic.. other punishments im sure would of sufficed in these cases.. Ahmed even whilst waiting for court for 1 crime , goes out and commits another.. and comes off with less than the others.. it shows his contempt for the law.. the others have kept their heads down and tried to behave at least. Theft is theft at the end of the day... but its hardly armed robbery .. or aggravated burglary or death by wreckless driving even habitual drink drivers get less yet deserve more. Again the "justice" system is a joke.. sadly its so old no one finds it funny anymore.”

  • Profile image for PC_or_not_PC

    by PC_or_not_PC

    Thursday, February 23 2012, 1:13PM

    “This is a fascinating story”

  • Profile image for pooky2483

    by pooky2483

    Thursday, February 23 2012, 12:49PM

    “@Derby_born - I know exactly where you're coming from. I was only yesterday bookmarking 4oD and 5 as I can watch whatever I want, whenever I want, there's also BBC/ITV and if looked for hard enough. You can watch stuff like The Biggest Loser (all Seasons), the same with The Simpsons and Futurama among other series (only know this as my Grandson watched them). So, the way it's going, not only will Virgin and Sky lose out, so will the Vampire TV Licensing as the stuff you can watch online is NOT a 'live' broadcast, as stated by TV Licensing, you have to pay for 'live' broadcasts and not what is re-broadcast online.”

  • Profile image for B_o_b1

    by B_o_b1

    Thursday, February 23 2012, 12:34PM

    “Whilst not condoning in anyway the actions of these men, to state "And Virgin Media said the scam could have cost the company up to £32 million" is wholly inaccurate.

    The company has not lost this at all.

    To have thatincome in the first place, all the of the fraudulent customers would have had to have taken out full subscriptions and that is highly unlikely.

    I would hazzard a guess that Virgin is also quoting figures based upon all the customers paying full price for all available channels for the full length of time these men were operating.

    I sneaky crime being used to maximum effect by corporate spin.”

  • Profile image for janine2011

    by janine2011

    Thursday, February 23 2012, 11:37AM

    “It's the sentences that annoy me, they got longer than some get for assault or robbing an elderly person in their own home. Whilst what they did is fraud, it is sickening that some scroat who starved his cats to death got far less and the scumbags who robbed Mrs Bloor will proably get community service. Money talks.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article