Derbyshire County Primary Care Trust backs drug that 'could save sight of thousands'
DERBYSHIRE health experts are challenging national chiefs
and backing a drug they believe could save the NHS millions of
pounds and the sight of thousands of people.
Derbyshire County Primary Care Trust says the NHS could save
the sight of about 26,000 eye disease sufferers a year and
itself an estimated £78m annually by using Avastin.
The trust has been consulted on plans to introduce a
sight-saving drug called ranibizumab, commonly known as
Lucentis, but says the cheaper alternative should be
considered.
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
(NICE), the independent body that regulates NHS drug use in the
UK, says Lucentis is the best treatment for condition called
wet macular degeneration, which causes 26,000 older people to
go blind each year.
Patients only become eligible for treatment with Lucentis on
the NHS when they have already lost sight in one eye, in a bid
to save the sight in the other.
NICE wants to change the rules so people can have it as soon
as they are diagnosed.
But experts from the Derbyshire trust claim Avastin could do
the same job at a fraction of the cost and have appealed.
Both Avastin and Lucentis can be injected straight into a
patient's eye, and work by stopping changes in the blood
vessels at the back of the eyeball.
But Avastin is used in the UK as a cancer drug and not
licensed to treat sight problems, despite being used against
macular degeneration in other parts of the world.
Richard Richards, director of public health for the trust,
said: “There are a number of very technical points in our
appeal, but Lucentis is a very expensive drug and we have
concerns over the clinical trials NICE is basing its evidence
on. We think Avastin should be considered.
“A single treatment with Lucentis costs about £700, compared
to just £60 for an injection of Avastin.
"Including the cost of running clinics, we estimate Lucentis
could cost about £5,000 a year per patient, and Avastin £2,000.
So it's a saving of roughly £3,000 per patient.”
When NICE introduces new guidelines, a UK primary care trust
is chosen at random to review them, which is how the Derbyshire
trust became involved.
The results of the appeal are expected on Monday.
NICE can either review its proposals, or overturn the appeal
and bring the new guidelines into force.
Harry Ratner is a former member of Derby's patient and
public involvement forum.
He said: “The Derby trust is right. Avastin would be a lot
cheaper for the NHS, and I have been campaigning for it to be
licensed for use in this way.
“However Lucentis is still needed by lots of people in Derby
who are losing their sight, so I hope NICE approves its
use.”
Derbyshire Association for the Blind said it hoped
visually-impaired were being kept up to date with information
on the topic.











Comments
by annon, derbyshire
Friday, July 18 2008, 2:15PM
“COST!!!!!! THE MOST PRECIOUS THING WE HAVE IS OUR EYESIGHT.HOW DARE COST BE MENTIONED? THIS COUNTRY WASTE MILLIONS ON STUPID PROJECTS ,COUNCIL EXPENSES,TOO MANY POLITICIANS & THERE HANGERS-ON.......WOULD GORDON BROWN DENY HIS LOVED-ONES TREATMENT? WOULD THE ROYAL FAMILY? YET THEY TAKE OUR MONEY TO KEEP THEM.........I FIND THIS SICKENING & SHAMEFUL...........MAYBE THE NAT. LOTTERY MONEY SHOULD ALL GO TO THE NHS?? SO, MR BROWN WHY NOT MAKE A DECISION (IF YOU DARE).”