Expert cash-savers called in to save council money - but cost £1.2m

Trusted article source icon
Monday, June 14, 2010
Profile image for This is Derbyshire

This is Derbyshire

DERBY City Council is spending £1.2 million on a team of consultants… to help it save money.

The authority says it needs the advisors to help bring in major structural changes – including shedding 465 jobs or 10% of its workforce – with the aim of saving £32 million over the next three years.

But union leaders have blasted the move, describing it as a consultants' "feeding frenzy" and claiming that it demonstrates a lack of expertise among the council's senior management.

Initial work to identify where savings could be found was carried out by PricewaterhouseCoopers under a Government initiative, which meant the £110,000 cost was picked up by regional Government bodies.

But the council then agreed to hire PricewaterhouseCoopers to help with the rest of the process – even though it would have to fund the £1.2 million cost.

It said that support was "vital" to the transformation programme.

Councillor Sean Marshall, cabinet member for resources, said: "It's important that we get exactly the right people to work with us to deliver these savings and the consultants are giving us the skills and expertise to do this."

But the cost and reliance on consultants has angered public sector union Unison.

Regional secretary Charlie Carruth said: "The council was always seen as a well-run authority, which provided services well. Now, all of a sudden, all that expertise seems to have disappeared and they can't provide services so consultants have to come in and provide them – it is a nonsense.

"It seems to me that an awful lot of consultants are having a feeding frenzy at the council taxpayers' expense."

The council announced the changes to its structure in September last year following PricewaterhouseCooper's initial review. Implementation began in January.

Previously, the authority had five departments – corporate and adult services, children and young people, regeneration and community, environmental services and resources and the chief executive's office.

But that has been reduced to four – children and young people, adults and health, resources and neighbourhoods and responsibility for regeneration has moved to the chief executive's department.

The number of corporate directors was reduced after retirements.

And a review was carried out into the 25 assistant director roles and 97 heads of services, with proposals to reduce those by 30 posts.

That was changed to a reduction of 23 following consultation with staff.

Now the authority is carrying out reviews in other areas of its work to see where more savings can be made, with the help of the PricewaterhouseCoopers advisors.

Mr Marshall said: "The initial work carried out by the consultancy firm offered an independent and groundbreaking method of assessing where the council could operate more efficiently.

"However, it was only an initial assessment – it did not go into the detail of how we change and restructure to reduce our budgets and deliver cashable savings.

"Our budget for the next three years includes a total of £23.5m savings and there is scope to make further savings over time."

He added: "Over time, our staff will learn these skills as the transformation programme continues. We are managing consultancy costs within the £1.2m and believe this represents value for money in the long term."

PricewaterhouseCoopers refused to go into detail on the work it was doing or its charges, saying it had nothing to add to the council's statement.

14
Tweet this article
Report

14 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Dianne, Derby

    Tuesday, June 15 2010, 7:24AM

    “Hey, why don't the Council use the money to update their computer systems instead! How many of us get numerous versions of our updated tax details plus/less additions/reductions? A re-write is much needed along with programmers who are passed their sell by dates. The Council's computer system is pants!!!!”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Dianne, Derby

    Monday, June 14 2010, 7:44PM

    “So, we're all agreed then! The Council are about to spend our money to make the decisions that we or ex-emplyees could quite easily make without spending much more of our money. Does that make sense?”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by David Gale, Derby

    Monday, June 14 2010, 5:18PM

    “Angela - I wouldn't hold your breath. This is more about an old-pals club of trouble-shooting civil servants and suppliers who did a similarly expensive number on another authority before landing on Derby. It is a shame that starting from an acknowledged position of being well-ahead of the game in 2006, a small number of empire building officers have been allowed to make the kind of hash of the transformation agenda that has left fertile ground for the 'trouble-shooters'. Councillors don't know what they don't know, so most have no way of knowing what's actually going on... other than the party leaders whom I have personally briefed, that is.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Angela, Derby

    Monday, June 14 2010, 4:54PM

    “Perhaps I should apply for the CEOs job at the council, I can certainly show him the mistakes he has made. I wouldn't want his obscene salary either. It isn't necessary to have £3000 a week, no-one is worth that.
    I was at the top end of management in my job before I retired from it. During my employment I got rid of a lot of deadwood, those who couldn't do their job, as well as duplicate roles.
    A streamlined business works better and is more cost effective.
    If he needs any tips he can contact me, I am sure the Telegraph will pass on my details.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by David Gale, Derby

    Monday, June 14 2010, 3:51PM

    “Angela is indeed correct in her assertion that there have been employees within the council capable of delivering much more than PWC. Unfortunately, this has been derailed by a handful of senior officers that have taken it upon themselves to engage in an internal empire-building process, at a cost to tax-payers of £millions.

    In the past few years, I have alerted both Labour and LibDem administrations' leaderships to what was happening but both considered it politically expedient to do nothing. Worse than that, both leaders consulted with the culpable officers in drawing up their 'no action' response. In recent months, the new Chief Executive has also dismissed offers of information that would assist the council in its plight. What we're now seeing instead is a bean-feast for suppliers who will deliver a range of prohibitively expensive short-term 'solutions' that will continue to cost Derby long after the 'trouble-shooters' have packed up and disappeared.

    I have today made an offer to Harvey Jennings to brief him on exactly what has been going on. It will be interesting to see if the new administration really is a new start or whether they too will tug their forelock to Sir Humphrey...”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article