Farmers 'disappointed' as badger cull in parts of Derbyshire is put on hold until at least 2013

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Profile image for Derby Telegraph

Derby Telegraph

A BADGER cull in parts of Derbyshire and Staffordshire will not happen until next year at the earliest, says the National Farmers Union.

Richard Hezlet, the NFU's East Midlands director, was speaking after the Government rejected his union's bid for the area to be included in trial culls this year.

The Government had agreed these should take place to see if they are effective in controlling bovine tuberculosis, which badgers are blamed for spreading among cattle herds.

Pilot schemes, under which badgers will be shot by licensed farmers and landowners, will take place in west Gloucestershire and west Somerset.

But Derbyshire Wildlife Trust, which has spoken out against the cull, believes there will be a legal challenge to the cull wherever it happens.

Mr Hezlet said that parts of West Derbyshire and East Staffordshire were among the areas worst affected by bovine TB.

He said: "Our argument was that the area is on the edge of where the disease has spread to and that we were keen to stop it spreading eastwards.

"We were disappointed not to be selected for the trials but we were really pleased with the support from farmers as we made the bid.

"Realistically, our chances were never great but we got really close to selection."

He said the union hoped to be in the next round of areas where farmers would be licensed to cull. Mr Hezlet said: "It depends on how the trials go – they are about proving that culling by contract shooting works – but we are hopeful of getting them in 2013."

Animal rights organisations, including those in Derbyshire, have threatened a campaign of criminal damage to stop culls when they take place.

Wildlife trust chief executive Ed Green said there was scientific evidence that a cull would not stop the spread of bovine TB.

This, he said, was because removing most of the infected badgers in a cull allows other badgers to come in from surrounding areas and become infected.

The trust says experts also believe that reducing the number of animals in an area will lead to increased movement of badgers as they look to populate new areas, causing the disease to spread.

Mr Green said he was not happy with the culling trials taking place anywhere.

He said: "The trials will almost certainly be subject to a legal challenge.

"I really hope the Government doesn't go ahead with the culls anywhere."

In order to be granted a licence, those taking part in the trials must demonstrate a high level of competence in marksmanship and then complete a Government-approved course.

At the same time, farmers will have to comply with Government TB cattle controls and bring in biosecurity measures to minimise the spread of bovine tuberculosis.

Environment Secretary Caroline Spelman had previously said that culling could reduce the incidence of bovine TB across the country by 10%.

2
Tweet this article
Report

2 Comments

  • Profile image for Derby_born

    by Derby_born

    Saturday, February 11 2012, 10:27PM

    “Badgers (Meles meles) have lived in Britain for at least 250,000 years. The latest surveys show that there are a quarter of a million badgers in the UK, unevenly distributed across the country. The effects of persecution and changing land use mean that they have almost disappeared from some areas. http://tinyurl.com/7zxry7w (Wildlife Trust website)

    The main issue with a badger cull is that it does not take into account the fact that healthy, uninfected badger populations will be killed. The DEFRA report does not show that any effort is being made to test the population for Bovine TB.

    Here is what the RSPCA has to say about this unnecessary cull:
    "We think the government has taken the wrong fork in the road with this policy, which is full of risks and will contribute little or nothing to eradicating TB nationally. Instead it will wipe out huge numbers of this much-loved species, including many animals which are healthy.

    The RSPCA claims its view is based on clear and comprehensive science, but the
    government and groups in favour of a cull say the same thing. There seems to be lots
    of different science reports out there. Why is yours better than that of others?

    We believe that the Independent Scientific Group on cattle TB (ISG), which published its final report in 2007, provides the most robust scientific evidence to date. It was the result of painstaking research over nearly ten years, cost the lives of about 11,000 badgers and cost taxpayers £50 million. It concluded that killing badgers could actually increase the spread of bTB in the area around the cull, making matters worse rather than better – a process called perturbation. It said, "badger culling can make no meaningful contribution to cattle TB control in Britain".
    Here are some facts about Bovine TB : http://tinyurl.com/85qex2l (veterinary advice website).

    I have posted links to other official websites (DEFRA and RSPCA) that offer give factual information on this subject but for some reason the links have become corrupted and the sites are lost. However a Google search for RSPCA Bovine TB and Badger cull, should locate the missing/removed information.”

  • Profile image for dianae

    by dianae

    Thursday, January 26 2012, 10:17AM

    “Going out to shoot badgers can lead to infected badgers being disturbed from where they live and moving into unaffected areas - the rest of Derbyshire does not now have high levels of bovine TB and doesn't want to have in future!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters