Hippodrome owner's repair order reprieve
A NOTICE forcing the owner of the former Hippodrome theatre to repair the building is being withdrawn by Derby City Council.
The authority issued the enforcement notice on Christopher Anthony in October last year in an attempt to make him repair the Grade II-listed landmark.
-

Hippodrome
Mr Anthony was asked to bring the building back to the condition it was in before it collapsed during work by his contractors in March.
Huge sections of the Green Lane theatre were brought down when heavy machinery was used to probe the roof.
Mr Anthony was told that if he did not comply with the enforcement notice he would face an unlimited fine.
But because the developer said he would appeal, which could have led to a drawn-out and costly wrangle, the council agreed to delay enforcing the notice.
Instead it decided to work with him to find another use for the building, retaining some of its original features but bringing it back into use.
Today, the council has revealed it will withdraw the enforcement notice because it is stopping Mr Anthony getting the money he needs to submit a suitable planning application.
A spokeswoman said: "Currently the enforcement notice is preventing the owner from raising the finance to pay for the costs associated with submitting the application.
"These costs include professional reports, including architects' drawings, which must accompany any application together with the statutory planning application fee, which could be in the region of £30,000.
"The positive momentum must be maintained, therefore the council has agreed to formally withdraw the enforcement notice."
The council said it did not meant that another enforcement notice could not be served in the future if Mr Anthony did not submit plans.
"Derby City Council is monitoring the situation closely and will continue to act in the interest of the public and the preservation of the Hippodrome," the spokeswoman said.
"However, the legal processes involved are complex and time-consuming, and we realise this has been a frustrating time for the public and other interested parties."
The fate of the Hippodrome touched the hearts of many theatre-goers, historians and residents.
Its partial demolition in March led the council to seek a High Court injunction stopping Mr Anthony from touching the building further without its permission.
The authority won that order in April last year and it said it was still investigating what had occurred when the damage to the Hippodrome was caused with a view to a possible prosecution.







11 Comments
View all
by KEVIN, derby
Friday, January 16 2009, 3:59PM
“derby needs modernising let not grip on to the passed to much.
he who only wants what is gone will only find a monkey”
by Steve, Derby
Friday, January 16 2009, 2:22PM
“It could be argued that both the previous regime and the current lot can share the blame for this one. Williams and Co. for letting it happen in the first place and then Limp Dims with their dithering and it-wasn't-us, devil-may-care attitude.”
by Geoff, Shardlow
Friday, January 16 2009, 2:07PM
“I'd love to see it restored as a theatre and I don't consider myself a dreamer. But the substantial point is that Mr Anthony should NOT be allowed to get away with it. Anyone who buys a listed building takes on certain responsibilities for its care. If he can't afford to fix it, the council should certainly NOT be helping him to line his pockets from its destruction. They should take a very hard line or this sort of thing will continue to happen.”
by R, Derby
Friday, January 16 2009, 2:03PM
“What about the listed building status - has this been swept under the carpet ? surely the council should listen to public opinion, after all the public put them in power.”
by Mr Bronson, Belper
Friday, January 16 2009, 1:54PM
“Wasn't it the previous Council that let this happen in the first instance?”
by andy, lawless derby
Friday, January 16 2009, 1:28PM
“Did people really expect the spineless LibDem council to do anything but roll-over to a wealthy property developer?
Mrs Jones and her motley crew have once again ( i'm starting to lose count ) shown nothing but contempt for the people of Derby and it's deminishing heritage.
LimpDims: You are a disgrace.”
by Mr Bronson, Belper
Friday, January 16 2009, 1:19PM
“I just think that the people who would like to see it resurrected as a theatre or arts centre are living in a dream world and will be greatly disappointed. Channelling its direction down that path would just be a waste.”
by Shekaal, Derby
Friday, January 16 2009, 1:13PM
“I wood expect flats to be in place in the future. Coundn't aford one my self but its better than this eyesore. At least no more bingo!”
by Emma, Derby
Friday, January 16 2009, 11:50AM
“Derby City Council are a joke ... people wonder why Nottingham is still so much more popular than Derby, perhaps DCC should take note. They retain old architecture and don't build stupid buildings like the Quad. They have a lovely old theatre which attracts the biggest touring shows, as well as an Arena. There's really no comparison.”
by Victoria, DERBY
Friday, January 16 2009, 11:50AM
“Utter bonkers, have the council no back bone? I really can¿t believe what I have just read.
I think a petition should be started by the residents of Derby; Mr Anthony is not a Derby resident after all so what does he care it is not his heritage he is only in this for money.
Does anyone think a petition is a good idea ? Let me know
vmwheeler1@googlemail.com”