Millions in developers' contributions is unspent in Derby

Trusted article source icon
Monday, April 13, 2009
Profile image for This is Derbyshire

This is Derbyshire

MILLIONS of pounds which has been taken from developers during the past five years to help improve Derby has not been spent.

Companies behind big building schemes which put new strain on services such as roads and schools pay extra cash to Derby City Council as a condition of getting planning permission.

The authority can use this for schemes like road improvements, new schools or doctors' surgeries and housing for first-time buyers.

In the past five financial years, the council has taken around £8.5m of this money but an investigation by the Evening Telegraph has revealed that it has only spent £2.5m so far. The remainder is still waiting to be spent or allocated to projects.

Dave Black of the Derby branch of the Taxpayers' Alliance said: "I think it is outrageous that money is being allowed to accumulate like that."

Developers sign what are know as Section 106 agreements, which commit them to providing money for public improvements as a condition of getting planning permission.

Mr Black said: "The whole purpose of Section 106 agreements was that they should help the community – how are they doing that if the money isn't being spent?"

One of the largest contributions still not spent is £500,000 which was taken for the development of the cinema at the Westfield centre in 2006-07.

According to details obtained by the Evening Telegraph under the Freedom of Information Act, the council has still not decided how it wants to spend that money.

Similarly, £231,122 collected as part of the Highfields Broadway development in the 2005-2006 financial year has not been spent or provisionally allocated to any schemes.

But the council said that only £200,000 collected as part of the biggest developments has not yet been earmarked to be spent. The remainder has been allocated to various schemes, which have not yet got under way.

Councillor Lucy Care, cabinet member for planning and highways, said that to get the best out of the money it was sometimes necessary to wait before spending it.

"With the Westfield development, for example, we are currently using some of that money to fund the shopper hopper bus and if we had spent that money straight away it wouldn't be available for us to use now.

"I think the agreements are important. It isn't always just about giving money, it can specify things which should be done as part of the development as well, such as providing a bus service."

Section 106 agreements do not have to involve money. They can be used to get a developer to carry out certain work as part of the development, like building a new school.

The largest contribution in the past five years has come from the building of Westfield, when nearly £2.8m was given to the council.

That money has been allocated, with £1m going to the Connecting Derby scheme to complete the Inner Ring Road.

The rest went towards projects such as the refurbishment of East Street, the Business Improvement District, Christmas lights, and the Open for Business campaign to drive up trade in the Cathedral Quarter.

Westfield said it felt the cash it had paid through section106 agreements had helped the city. A spokeswoman said: "Westfield provided Derby City Council with a substantial sum to help with the improvement and regeneration of other parts of the city.

"In addition, Westfield provided improvements to Traffic Street, London Road, a replacement Shopmobility facility, bus lanes and promoted employment initiatives."

7
Tweet this article
Report

7 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Roy, Derby

    Monday, April 13 2009, 2:30PM

    “They are probably saving it for a few more bridges or buildings put up without the aid of a spirit level ;-)”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by mary, derby

    Monday, April 13 2009, 2:26PM

    “funny that, I was told by miller homes they had given the council money for recreational use and when I asked the council what they had done with it, they said they didnt know what I was talking about !”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Joanne, Derbys

    Monday, April 13 2009, 12:13PM

    “I had the impression that budgets were tight in Derby, following the news about the possible closure of public toilets in the city a few months ago. Also, it has taken ?3 years
    for the bus station to be completed. If this money is set aside for public services and basic provisions, how come so much unspent? It seems from this article this may be in the region of ?£6 million.
    Good on the DET for investigating this, and informing the public.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by steve, derby

    Monday, April 13 2009, 9:00AM

    “When the council asks for this money from devolpers then surely it must be spent in the area where the devolpment is to help improve the lives of those affected by the devolpment. As it seems it has not the is this deception? Would the devolpers be able to claim the money back? The council is not a private business it is there to serve the community so these monies should of had an allocated use before is was collected.

    Would the council please tell us when we as the residents are going to see the benifit of this money ? If indeed we are.

    If the council is having trouble finding schemes the perhaps we who live in the communities would be able to put forward our ideas.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by M, Derby

    Monday, April 13 2009, 8:23AM

    “To quote DET 21/2/09:

    "Derby City Council has invested £140,000 in the Shopper Hopper over the next two years after research showed people did not want to walk from Westfield to the Cathedral Quarter."

    Research may have showed they did not want to walk - but did it show they wanted to catch a bus which takes longer?

    If the service ran straight down St Peters St and Cornmarket, turning at the Spot and Market Place every 10 minutes, perhaps people would use it.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by mr, derby

    Monday, April 13 2009, 8:22AM

    “i hope all this unspent money is not sitting in a foreign bank.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by M, Derby

    Monday, April 13 2009, 8:12AM

    “I see the Shopper Hopper bus has been mentioned again. How much money has been spent on this so far?

    And is there a chance to scrap it if it continues to be under-used?”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters