Outrage as workers dig hole for phone mast that had been refused planning permission
TELECOM giants Vodafone and O2 have been accused of "sheer, blatant arrogance" after workers began digging a hole for a phone mast that had been refused planning permission.
The work sparked fury after getting under way on Brackens Green, outside the
Angry residents beside where workmen started their hole. Pictured, from left, are Ged Bielby, Martyn Gowland, Margaret Bielby, Keith Foster, Gary Marshall, David Hopkins and Stephen Flower.
Angry residents beside where workmen started their hole. Pictured, from left, are Ged Bielby, Martyn Gowland, Margaret Bielby, Keith Foster, Gary Marshall, David Hopkins and Stephen Flower.





">Brackens Hotel pub, in Alvaston, early yesterday morning.
But a Vodafone spokesman last night said work was started after Derby City Council "did not issue us with valid notification" of the application being rejected.
"Therefore under planning law we automatically receive planning consent for the development," he said.
Residents in and around the area had fiercely opposed the plans for what would be a fourth phone mast within an 800-yard vicinity.
Masts of 15 metres and above need planning permission.
Almost 300 people signed a petition urging Derby City Council to refuse permission on the grounds that the mast would be an "unacceptable impact" on visual amenities.
And they were overjoyed when the authority ruled in their favour in October and allegedly told the phone giants to find somewhere else to erect the mast.
So when digging started on Brackens Green, Gary Marshall, landlord of the Brackens Hotel pub, went out and told the workmen to stop.
But the workmen insisted they had been advised by their bosses that planning permission was in place and that they had been sent to dig the hole for the mast.
Mr Marshall then phoned Boulton councillor Ranjit Banwait, who had led the campaign against the mast.
Mr Banwait, who was in Birmingham, said he had been furious and managed to stop the work from continuing after contacting O2 and telling the company it was breaching planning regulations.
Speaking afterwards to the Derby Telegraph, Mr Banwait said: "It's disgraceful. It sickens me that these utility companies believe they have the power and money to put up masts wherever the want.
"It's sheer blatant arrogance."
Mr Banwait said he was alarmed the O2 executive told him that he had been under the impression planning permission was in place.
He said: "There's been a comedy of errors and I will be asking for an investigation into how this happened."
Mr Banwait added he had suspicions the hole was about to be dug, but that he had been assured otherwise.
He said: "A few weeks ago I had concerns as the hole was being marked out. I rang the council and asked if the planning decision had been overturned, but I was assured the refusal still stood and that the companies were looking at other locations to put it."
A Vodafone spokesman said: "We wrote to Derby City Council in mid-January, confirming that it is our belief that we had planning consent for the site, and that we would be commencing the build shortly but we did not receive a response from them.
"Accordingly, we started the build of the site today but when our team was challenged by residents we decided to suspend the build because health and safety issues had arisen."
Mr Marshall said: "Thankfully we managed to get the work stopped and they've filled the hole in."
No-one from the council was last night available for comment.







15 Comments
View all
by John Stewart, Hilton, Derby
Sunday, February 20 2011, 8:37PM
“To "DerbyBorn", without wishing to comment on the merit of this proposal, I can confirm that, in the UK, the Government (by which I mean several governments ago) opted for a system of very low-power transmitters covering a quite restricted area. Combined with the policy of market competition this has resulted in a high density of transmitters. Other countries do indeed have fewer, but they are taller and more powerful.”
by Pat Arrowsmith, Derby
Sunday, February 20 2011, 11:22AM
“I never know how these comment pages are going to go, I was hoping that the respondees would stick up for the residents involved against 'the man'. Particularly as planning permission has been refused. Instead it appears there is accusations of nimbyism and local government incompetence. Bravo! Excelled yourselves as usual. Well done.”
by Roy, Derby
Sunday, February 20 2011, 7:24AM
“Good for them. After all, the Brackens is an area of outstanding natural beauty ;)”
by whitevanram, Here
Sunday, February 20 2011, 7:10AM
“Just love NIMBYs lol... but i am sure they can reply on their phone (if they can get a signal!!)”
by Eric, Spondon
Saturday, February 19 2011, 9:38PM
“Curious reader, the link below answers your question. The City Council sent the decison notice refusing consent on 3rd November, so why Vodaphone still believed they had consent in January is anyone's guess!
http://eplanning.derby.gov.uk/acolnet/planningpages02/acolnetcgi.gov?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeDocs&TheSystemkey=90365”
by Pete, In the rural bits
Saturday, February 19 2011, 3:35PM
“That means they must have a spare mast now.
Can we have it? The signal out here is rubbish.”
by Tom, Derby
Saturday, February 19 2011, 11:55AM
“@ Citizen and Andy
Why would you suggest a mast being placed in Andy's garden? That¿s not the issue here so your comment is void.
As someone said previously, I bet every single one of these moaners use mobile phones, they evidentially have too much time on their hands.”
by curious reader, spondon,derby
Saturday, February 19 2011, 10:51AM
“But a Vodafone spokesman last night said work was started after Derby City Council "did not issue us with valid notification" of the application being rejected.
Is this a result of the council officers being incompetent because it is unprofesional, a feeble excuse from Vodaphone or a combination of these things? The area is already over blessed wih these structures and I don't understand why the telecom companies don't work together to minimise the intrusion into a residential area. Cllr Banwait is quite right to stand up for the residents that is what he is elected for.”
by Andy, Derby
Saturday, February 19 2011, 10:46AM
“@Citizen
If they pay the rent then yes!
If you have a valid reason as to why I shouldn't then say what it is.
I will look forward to viewing your response vis either the microwave link that supplies my telephone exchange with it's broadband signal or my smart phone via its 3G signal.”
by citizen, Derby
Saturday, February 19 2011, 9:44AM
“They could always look up the fact that there is no proven adverse health effects associated with mobile phones.
. Andy, Derby
I presume you will be offering to have a mast stuck in your garden then ?”