Head's bailiffs threat over parent debt

Trusted article source icon
Monday, August 03, 2009
Profile image for This is Derbyshire

This is Derbyshire

A HEAD teacher is threatening to call in bailiffs to recover debts from parents who owe more than £2,000 to his school.

Simon Emsley is desperate to recoup the money from the 10 families involved.

He is angry that repeated demands for money that parents owe for their children's meals and school trips have fallen on deaf ears.

Mr Emsley said: "It is time to get tough as the cash we are having to use to plug the debt is coming out of our budget. The selfish actions of a few are spoiling things for the majority of pupils."

The parental debt problem is not limited to Lakeside School and it is believed that across the city thousands of pounds is owed to schools by parents and is often written off when children move on to other schools.

Last Christmas, Mr Emsley was forced to cancel pupils' traditional annual free trip to the city's pantomime at the Assembly Rooms because the hole in the school budget meant it could not be funded.

He said: "This will happen again this year if we can't recover some of this money but it really isn't fair on those people who pay regularly."

Schools are responsible for recovering money and ensuring their budgets break even.

Three years ago, the city council suggested head teachers should write to parents to ask for the money.

But Mr Emsley said sending letters had not worked.

It has also been suggested that schools could recover the money by taking parents to court.

Mr Emsley said: "I don't think the school governors and other parents would thank me for spending excessive amounts of money to recover the debt."

Now, he is seeking advice from the city council's debt collection department in a bid to find out what further action he can take.

The problem has arisen for Lakeside Community Primary because some parents send their children to school without any food or money to pay for meals.

Mr Emsley admits he finds it difficult to allow a child to go hungry but feels his good nature is being taken advantage of.

He said: "I am currently taking advice from city council officials to see if sending in bailiffs, or debt collectors, is feasible and cost-effective."

Other parents have agreed for their children to go on extra-curricular school trips but have not paid the fees.

The council is unlikely to collect debts from parents on a school's behalf but can give guidance to head teachers.

The schools have to pre-order the food from the council's catering service and so it is their budgets that take the hit if parents then fail to pay up.

Usually, the families involved are not among those considered to be suffering financial hardship, whose children already receive free meals.

Joan Stannard, head at St Joseph's Catholic Primary School, in Mill Lane, Derby, has encountered this problem.

She said heads needed to take a firm line with parents.

"If a school cannot keep this level of debt down then pupils will suffer because the money won't be available to spend on books or paper," she said.

"We speak to parents about the problem, send letters and then finally ask them to fetch their children at lunchtime if they are not prepared to pay."

A leading teaching union said that parental debt is a growing problem for schools.

Mike Welsh, vice-president of the National Association of Head Teachers, said: "This has been a problem for some time but the economic recession is making it worse.

"As school budgets come under more pressure, heads will be looking to ensure debts don't accrue.

"It is right to feed a child without money or food but parents need to be contacted urgently to ensure it doesn't carry on happening.

"There is no easy answer and very few schools will want to resort to courts or bailiffs."

Derby City Council said it understood the schools' dilemma.

Andrew Flack, city council director for children and young people, said: "We understand schools wanting to make sure that children have a meal versus the need to recover costs and the impact that may have on the school budget.

"This is a matter for each school to manage locally as they see best, but we will continue to look at ways in which we can support them in this difficult matter."

12
Tweet this article
Report

12 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by tim, amber valley

    Monday, August 03 2009, 2:50PM

    “I agree with the parents that pay for their kids. I am actually a bailiff and see all forms of hardship, but why should we let these freeloaders get the same "benefits" as the ones that CONTRBUTE TO THE SYSTEM? Let's get some standards and quality back into our communities and let's get the loafers and spongers away from the Jeremy Kyle show and out to work, blah blah.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by DW, Derby

    Monday, August 03 2009, 1:48PM

    “I am a parent of a child who attends LCPS and i remember the look of disappointment on my daughters face when told the Christmas Pantomime was "cancelled" !
    These non paying parents should be totally ASHAMED of themselves and realise that by them refusing to pay their outstanding debts it is having a knock on effect that is affecting every child in the school .!
    I understand that some people are having financial difficulties, especially in the current situation that most people are in today.but come on ... pay your dues !!!
    Would you go to a restaurant and refuse to pay for your childs meal ? Would you take your child out for the day to a theme park etc and refuse to pay them ?
    Chances are though, that these parents still find the money to go out on a weekend and still manage to buy a 20 pack of cigs everyday !!
    COME ON YOU LOT PAY UP AS ITS ONLY THE CHILDREN WHO ARE SUFFERING FOR IT !”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Ex-teacher, Local

    Monday, August 03 2009, 12:21PM

    “I don¿t know if things have changed a lot since I retired from teaching but I could only ask for ¿voluntary contributions¿ from parents. I would budget for genuine hardship cases but it was often the better off who avoided payment. The number of school trips declined as a consequence. Having to produce risk assessments and fear of litigation finally deterred me from organising any but the fieldtrips necessary for coursework towards the end of my career.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by parent, Derby

    Monday, August 03 2009, 11:24AM

    “Perhaps he should name and shame them on a big poster attached to the school door, it is unfair on parents who pay for their childs lunch and school trips, they might be more likely to pay up if they thought every parent and child would know they were refusing to pay up.”

  • Profile image for This is Derbyshire

    by Nick, Derby

    Monday, August 03 2009, 10:59AM

    “It is disgraceful that some parents do not pay up.

    I bet the parents concerned still have a fiver in their back pockets for a packet of fags each day.

    Prehaps the school should send out a list to all parents showing those that have paid and those that havent.

    I think its fair for the head to say he wont restrict the youngsters who's parents havent paid, but it does make one wonder what else the parents dont pay for, it isnt really setting a good example for the kids, no wonder so many grow up expecting handouts and something for nothing.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article