We'll fight badger cull with criminal damage, vow animal activists
ANIMAL rights activists are threatening a campaign of criminal damage if Derbyshire farmers are given the go-ahead to cull badgers.
The Government has been consulting on how to deal with the spread of bovine tuberculosis.
-

A decision is expected within the next few months – and it is widely anticipated that farmers and landowners in several parts of England could be issued with licences to shoot badgers, which are blamed for spreading the disease to cattle herds.
Parts of Derbyshire are among the areas worst-hit by the disease and it is thought farmers here could be among those taking part in a national cull of up to 6,000 badgers.
But the proposal is mired in controversy and a spokesman for the Animal Liberation Front warned that its members could take direct action if shooting licences were granted.
The anonymous spokesman said: "I imagine individuals or autonomous groups within the ALF will try to take action to prevent the killings. This could involve damaging equipment used in the culls."
A 10-year study into badger culling, commissioned by the Government but carried out by independent scientists, concluded in 2007 that it would be ineffective in controlling the spread of bovine TB and should not be pursued.
And Derby North MP Chris Williamson, a former fox hunt saboteur, claimed that vaccination was a better route forward. "Culling is an excuse for bad husbandry and very cruel," he said.
The Badger Trust is also campaigning against any cull. It says existing measures introduced by the Government to isolate herds affected by TB were already working and points to a drop in the number of cattle slaughtered as part of bovine TB control measures – from 25,557 in 2009 to 24,899 in 2010 – as evidence.
Trust spokesman Jack Reedy agreed that West Derbyshire and East Staffordshire were historically hot-spots for the disease and said that, if culling was allowed, he and fellow members would visit local farmers to try to persuade them not to use it on their land.
But a National Farmers' Union spokeswoman said many of its members in the county had supported the idea of a cull in the Government consultation.
"Culling has to be an option. We would only ever rely on science and, despite what campaigners might say, there is evidence to suggest that removing badgers from the equation could work," she said.
Under Government regulations, cows with TB must be sent for slaughter and calves cannot be sold on until a herd is clear of the disease.
The government pays compensation to farmers whose cattle have been slaughtered. A total of £63m was spent dealing with bovine TB in 2009-10.
Etwall farmer Angela Sargent has experienced the devastation caused by an outbreak of TB, which she said could be linked to a badger sett on her farm.
She supports the Government proposal but says she would not take part in culling herself.
Mrs Sargent, 51, of Baldfields Farm, said Government officials stopped her specialist beef farm selling cattle in November 2005 to prevent the spread of TB.
The restriction, which lasted 120 days, meant 20 animals at the farm had to be sent straight to a slaughterhouse. This meant they did not get the price they would have achieved by being sold to butchers at market.
"We think the tuberculosis happened when we moved cows into a new field and it turned out there was a badger sett there," she said.
"We have a closed herd, we don't buy cattle in, so the disease must have come in on wildlife."
Mrs Sargent said two of her immediate neighbours were currently banned from moving cattle.
She said animal rights activists were taking a one-sided view of badger culling. "There's more than just badgers involved in this. The Farm Crisis Network deals with farmers that are suicidal because of the problems tuberculosis causes," she said.
Tory East Midlands MEP Roger Helmer said there was "no doubt" badgers were responsible for spreading bovine TB despite "all the froth from animal rights groups".
"I believe it's the case that many farmers take matters into their own hands already. Frankly I sympathise with them. We expect milk to be cheaper than water and yet we put all these difficulties in the way of our farmers," he said.
The consultation paper on culling drawn up by the Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs (Defra) says licences for culling would be "subject to strict criteria".
It says: "Badger-culling has the potential to reduce bovine TB in cattle by rapidly reducing the overall number of infected badgers, thus reducing the rate of transmission of the disease to cattle."
The document adds that cage trapping and shooting would be the only "humane" methods of culling.
Defra said a decision, at first expected early this year, had been delayed by the large response to the consultation.







25 Comments
View all
by mollyjayne
Tuesday, June 14 2011, 11:41PM
“Culling? Quote it as it is, the killing of sentient beings. I fail to see how the culling of badgers will reduce the spread of TB. Call me ignorant but is there not a vaccination available to protect cattle, or even the badgers, against TB?”
by Graham, Sheffield
Thursday, May 05 2011, 10:46PM
“Tory East Midlands MEP Roger Helmer said "I believe it's the case that many farmers take matters into their own hands already. Frankly I sympathise with them."
It appears he is happy to sympathise with law breakers when they are supporting Tory policy. Perhaps he will support the Animal Liberation Front if they too express their freedom and take direct action.”
by Townie, Derby
Wednesday, May 04 2011, 6:06AM
“Forget the badgers, it's the long hot, dry spell the farmers are moaning about now.
What do you call a happy farmer?
Retired ;)”
by Vanessa, Derby
Wednesday, May 04 2011, 1:09AM
“@Roger, Derby. Yes animal rights activitists were at fault in releasing mink. However now we are talking about an indigenous flagship species which does not deserve to be culled.
Mycobacterium bovis IS transmitted through badgers. There is no doubt about this. The controversial factor in this equation is that a study by an independant scientific group comissioned by the government which said A CULL DOES NOT REDUCE THE LEVELS OF TB. This was a intensive cull undertaken over ten years which cost the tax payers around fifty million pounds.
It also goes on to say that culling can actually increase the transmission of TB. Badgers are highly territorial. However, if a group is culled within a certain area, this will increase movement in badgers from other populations. This then spreads TB further than if the original territories had been adhered to.
This study then goes on to say that the most efficient way of reducing TB, is to introduce better cattle management and inoculations.
This is the most extensive study on badgers and TB ever undertaken. This was not produced by 'namby pamby' animal lovers. These were scientists and not adverse to culling in the first place. What I fail to see is how this information has been ignored, by both the government and farmers alike.
Farmers, where is your evidence to show the contrary? What studies have you performed which show that a cull will work?
I fully sympathise that farmers are finding times difficult at the moment but, hey, join the queue of the other millions of people in the UK that are finding times hard.
Culling does not work!”
by Liz, Big Palace place
Wednesday, May 04 2011, 12:24AM
“Where's Micky Abutt gone? I'm missing his constructive comments.”
by Simon, Blagreaves, Derby
Tuesday, May 03 2011, 10:05PM
“Welcome to Spring Watch Derbyshire and lets go live to the badger set down on dingley dell farm (made up name) just outside Derby to see whats happening as the sun goes down. We have put out hand fulls of peanuts in recent days the badgers favourite food although sadly we have not seen any badgers on film since farmer Brown was seen heading towards the badger set with a shot gun !
The culling of badgers is a serious issue - as is biodiversity but in this case killing badgers in an attempt to deal with the TB issue is put before such biodiversity ! Some are saying killing local badgers simply brings others in from elsewhere potentially bringing in TB from elsewhere, others say badgers can be inoculated. I find it very rich that farmers may be proposing this when it is farmers feeding rendered down dead animals back to cattle that brought us the terror that is BSE / VCJD - something that makes bovine TB seem like a nasty cough !”
by Iain, Derby
Tuesday, May 03 2011, 8:51PM
“so they are nuclear badgers now ae they peter? Nuclear Asian badgers with a taste for sniffing cigarette filters
Keep it coming your better than a night at a comedy gig”
by Urban Leprechaun, Devon
Tuesday, May 03 2011, 7:59PM
“The farming columnist of the Western Morning News, (Devon and Cornwall) a newspaper of the same group as the Derrby Evening Telegraph, in a recent article was "relaxed" (so to say) about the idea that some of the badger roadkill were badgers illegally culled, and dumped, so as to look like a roadkill. He pointed out that these badgers were always in the road edge - never in the middle of the road.”
by peter, spondon
Tuesday, May 03 2011, 7:27PM
“i spent my early years on the farm my relatives still own over 3000 acres . i also wprked in ockbrook on a farm . wise guys show us proof badgers are the cause .you cant neither can the experts /.have you seen some ingredients have you seen some of the contaminated waste food .and dead carcasses oftrn go into animal feed .even pet food ../my relatives have never had tb .even when they had a much larger herd .can any 1 person put on a website proof badgers cause tb .we can all read it ..as for celanese explain the cancer rate in spondon 670 /has allestree dufield .got these rates no .now rols royce are building another nuclear reactor .do they ever learn..my mother worked on the tb ward in leicester years ago .it was vile swon to secrecy as well .humans cause the biggest ,medical problems on the plannet .not the animals .”
by Christopher, Derby
Tuesday, May 03 2011, 6:03PM
“"Etwall farmer Angela Sargent has experienced the devastation caused by an outbreak of TB, which she said could be linked to a badger sett on her farm".
I see the term "could be" is used here, so I would ask the question, is there any hard evidence that the Badger sett is responsible? Have the badgers been tested? or is this cull going to be based upon supposition and assumption of a "possible" contamination.
We are talking about a protected species here, an animal which plays a vital role in the eco-system. I have never heard of anything so irresponsible as killing hundreds of wild animals on the assumption that they "might" be responsible for spreading TB, without actually conducting reliable tests on the animals concerned.”