'Do the maths, pupils are at risk'
YOUNGSTERS have carried out a survey of traffic outside their school to help parents campaigning for a pedestrian crossing there.
Two accidents, including one involving a six-year-old girl, and several near misses have been reported in the past two years outside Grampian Primary School, in Sinfin.
-

making a note: Grampian Primary pupils Cameron Higgins and Chloe Broughton, both 11, help conduct the traffic survey.
There is no crossing in Grampian Way and pupils are forced to dodge between parked cars because there are no zig-zag markings outside the school.
As part of a safety campaign, parents and staff have formed human chains to escort pupils across the road.
Now, eight pupils from the school's top maths group have completed a traffic survey.
Deputy head Lystra Mann said: "We went out in the morning and took a 30-minute survey and again in the afternoon between 3pm and 3.30pm."
Mrs Lystra said pupils used the data they gathered to compare the morning and afternoon results and produced their own spread sheets to show the information.
They counted 520 vehicles – 465 of them cars – in just 30 minutes in the morning. This increased to 729 in the afternoon, with 655 of them cars.
Mrs Lystra said: "We will be sending the spread sheets to Derby City Council."
The council already has a 1,300-name petition from parents and residents appealing for a traffic crossing.
Barbara Hall, whose daughter was knocked down by a car in Grampian Way in February, as she left the school, has been leading the campaign.
The mother-of-seven said: "Everyone at the school is worried about the danger of crossing what is a very busy road.
"Our school does not have signs to warn traffic they are approaching a school or to slow down and it does not have a lollipop person either.
"We have been told to use a nearby underpass but some of the elderly residents in nearby sheltered housing can't manage the walk and we prefer not to go down it because it is deserted and dirty."
Cameron Higgins, 11, who took part in the survey said: "All other schools have a crossing of some kind, so what about us?"
Fellow pupil Ellen Kang, also 11, said: "The accidents to both children happened in the afternoon, when the traffic is at its heaviest.
"Double yellow lines are needed because the pupils trying to look into the road cannot see as parents park their cars in front of the school gates.
"And a crossing is needed to guarantee children's safety."
Demands for a crossing have been backed by Sinfin Neighbourhood Board and everyone is now waiting for a further response from the council.
Previously, the school was told by that a crossing was not necessary because of the underpass and that zig-zag marking would force parents to park in the nearby bus layby.











7 Comments
View all
by Rosanne, Lincoln
Friday, May 14 2010, 7:29PM
“This problem is not just located in Derbyshire but all over the UK.Many schools wish to have pedestrian crossings near their schools and are denied this by out dated County Council criteria.We have a campaign at www.kidscrosssafely.org.uk to change this and help schools and make it safe for children.We welcome support and wish to help.Please contact us.”
by Guffy, Mickleover
Friday, May 14 2010, 4:21PM
“Think your all missing the point here. The Council have been negligent by NOT putting zig-zags outside the school as well as other safety measures. It's ok to say teach children road safety but most motorists should slow down and NOT drive like idiots. If it was your children you'd be singing from a different hymn sheet I'm sure. The council do absolutely nothing. Primary School near me has no zig zags, no railings, 2 road signs and that's it. Accident waiting to happen. Council have been told and guess what they have done...absolutely nothing.”
by Ian, Long Eaton
Friday, May 14 2010, 12:35PM
“Also worth noting that Mrs Hall, whose daughter was knocked down, said on the BBC news that her daughter ran across to see a friend on the other side of the road. So it's Mrs Hall's responsibility to teach her child to cross the road safely and to look after her when she's in her care yet the rest of us will have to suffer the consequences of this unnecessary crossing which she's campaigning for, both financially (council tax) and traffic delay wise.”
by sarah, sinfin
Thursday, May 13 2010, 2:35PM
“Captin Sensible what sense you speak! The underpass was painted with murals and new lighting installed a few years ago, like you say there are not undesirables hanging around this is merely an excuse.Alot of money is spent on teaching children road saftey nothing else is needed except common sense! No one has considered the traffic implications or the fact that should it be a traffic light pedestrian crossing instead of a zebra crossing the buttons are always pressed by children even when they dont want to cross which will cause huge traffic problems.”
by Captain Sensible Motorist, Sinfin
Thursday, May 13 2010, 2:16PM
“For goodness sake, use the underpass, let the motorists park outside the school, put railings on the grass verge 4 feet from the road, but most of all, parents keep your kids under CONTROL. Can a car driver sue a parent if a kid damages his car? To the Council - please keep the underpass clean and tidy, and how about having the schoolkids paint the walls with a mural? There are only 4 roads out of sinfin so has anybody estimated the disruption to the traffic at peak periods if another pedstrian crossing was installed. Just another point, I walk past the underpass quite frequently and never see any undesirables hanging about. Think about it. Best wishes to everybody.”