There's no monkeying around with health and safety rules in Ripley
AN organ grinder and his toy monkey have been banned from
performing in the streets of a Derbyshire town due to concerns
-

SAFETY WORRIES: Organ grinder Paddy Cooke and his interactive toy monkey are banned from the streets of Ripley until a risk assessment is carried out
over health and safety.
Ripley Town Council had to cancel summer holiday act Paddy
Cooke and his monkey Simon, who were due to perform in the town
centre, after being ordered to carry out a risk assessment.
The decision was made after licensing bosses at Amber Valley
Borough Council wanted to gauge if the pair posed a danger to
the public.
A Punch and Judy show and a dance act have also been shelved
in the past three weeks.
Mr Cooke, of Crich, wears Victorian costume as he walks
around playing his organ, a copy of an instrument used more
than 150 years ago.
The 64-year-old, a former fireman and usher at Alfreton
Magistrates' Court, has been grinding organs for 15 years
He said: “It's not as if I have a live monkey which might
jump at people. Mine is a battery-operated interactive toy and
the best I have ever had. He says things like 'I want a banana'
and even once offered to tell me the sum of pi squared.
“Simon is sometimes quiet and sometimes chatty. He's very
realistic but is no danger to anyone.
“I suppose someone might trip over a paving slab when
listening to the music and blame me but I have been doing this
for years without a problem.”
Mr Cooke, whose two sons are also organ grinders, was hired
as part of the summer entertainment provided by the town
council and has £10m public liability insurance cover. He is
also a member of the actors' union, Equity.
But before his July 26 performance, the authority received
orders from Amber Valley Borough Council which demanded to see
a general risk assessment before letting street acts go
ahead.
It wanted to study a list of hazards and know how they could
be made safe, and even how many people might watch the
shows.
Ripley Mayor Lynn Joyes said: “The risks are very low and
how do performers know how big an audience they'll get? That
depends on the weather. If it's raining you might get five, but
if the weather is nice, there'll be 105.”
Labour group leader Geoff Carlile said: “This is typical of
bureaucracy gone mad. This was sprung on us at the last minute
and left us in a difficult situation.”
The council was told the ruling also applies to dance
groups, clowns and brass bands, including the Salvation
Army.
Steve Freeborn, who represents Butterley ward, said: “What
is the risk – it's absolutely potty.”
But the borough council defended its decision.
Simon Gladwin, head of landscape services, said: “We always
require that anyone organising a public event or entertainment
on land managed by the borough council completes a risk
assessment.
“In cases such as this, where performers are unable to
supply a personal risk assessment of their activities, it is
the responsibility of the organiser to provide the risk
assessment.
“These are not required for every performer. We simply
require an assessment that takes into account the different
activities taking place in each location,” he said.
The town council's summer entertainments programme has now
been suspended until further notice.
It is hoped that a risk assessment can be completed within
the next seven days then sent to the borough council for
approval.
Click on the button to share this story with a
friend
var addthis_pub = 'janeyg1976';











4 Comments
by Jem Sarna, Belper
Tuesday, August 05 2008, 1:58PM
“Disappointingly from a good newspaper such as yours, I find the article purposefully misleading and only looking to sensationalise another health and safety story.
If you read your own article ¿There's no monkeying around with health and safety rules in Ripley¿ you will see that Amber Valley Borough Council¿s statement was that risk assessments ¿are not required for every performer. We simply require an assessment that takes into account the different activities taking place in each location¿.
All too often we hear in the media of events being banned or cancelled due to ¿health and safety¿, when in fact it is a case that the organisers of an event or activity use this as an excuse to detract from other reasons for the cancellation. I would like point you too the Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (IOSH) website where you will find official responses to similar articles that appear in the national press.
A competent Health and Safety Professional will easily be able to quickly identify any significant hazards, while ignoring the trivial, and will be able propose suitable controls if required so that activities can be carried out with minimal risks.
If one of the acts included juggling with fire you would expect no less.
Jem Sarna CMIOSH”
by pete, Canada
Tuesday, August 05 2008, 1:37PM
“A live monkey perhaps. A toy one, what a joke! These councillors shoud be at the do as comedians. Subject of course to the very real risk of hurting folk with their sense of humour.”
by CMOT Dibbler, derby
Tuesday, August 05 2008, 12:02PM
“Pathetic!!!!!!!!!!!!”
by CMOT Dibbler, Derby
Tuesday, August 05 2008, 12:01PM
“Pathetic!!!!!!!!!!!”